What Is a Fair Distribution of Power

نویسنده

  • Werner Kirsch
چکیده

Voting in the EU-Council – a brief sketch At least since the EU-summit in Nice in December 2000 there has been an intensive discussion about the voting procedure in the EU-Council. The Treaty of Nice contains a very complicated procedure which consists of three voting criteria. A proposal is accepted by the Council if: 1) the (simple) majority of states support the proposal 2) the proposal receives a " qualified majority " of votes. Each state has a certain voting weight (from 3 votes for Malta to 29 votes for the four biggest states). A qualified majority means: At least 232 votes out of 321 possible votes is required (for the 25-member Union). 3) The countries supporting the proposal should represent at least 62 % of the population of the EU. It turns out that in this complicated voting system the first and the third criterion play virtually NO role. In contrast to this the draft Constitution contains a voting procedure which consists merely of step 1) and 2) of the Nice procedure. This procedure is called the " double majority " rule. More precisely, the Constitution rule requires a majority of (more than 50%) of the countries and more than 60% of the population. Especially Spain and Poland objected to this procedure since they claim they do not get enough influence in the Council by that procedure. (In fact, they are right, as we will see.) As a compromise the Irish Presidency proposed to change the quota in the double majority rule to 55% of the states and 65% of the population. It is quite likely that this voting system will be accepted by the European Governments. We will see below that for Spain and Poland this system is even worse than the original draft Constitution. How to analyse " power " With 25 member states and complicated voting procedures it is not a trivial task to analyse the distribution of power in the Council. However, there is a mathematical concept called " Power Index " to quantify the influence of a member of a committee, as in the Council for example. The main idea is that power is the ability to change the decision of the committee by your vote. Suppose we know how all the other members vote (" Yes " or " No "). Your vote is decisive in this situation if your " Yes " …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Social Justice in Economical Policies under the Presidency of Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani

Social justice is a concept of fair and just relations between the individual and society. This relation will assay by the government, according to fair distribution of opportunities and facilities. After 20 century, there was always emphasis on the role of states as social justice's agents in society by formulating and implementing of policy. The main question is what is the place of social ju...

متن کامل

Analytical Review of Fair Distribution of Recreational and Sport Services in by Using Topsis Model

Background. Fair distribution of sports facilities is very effective in the tendency of citizens to exercise. Therefore, the distribution of sports and recreational facilities in cities should be carefully and scientifically explored. Objectives. The purpose of this study was analytical review of fair distribution of recreational and sport services in the city of Mashhad by using Topsis model....

متن کامل

A Fair Power Allocation for Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access in the Power Domain

This paper presents an investigation on the performance of the Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) in the power domain scheme. A Power Allocation (PA) method is proposed from NOMA throughput expression analysis. This method aims to provide fair opportunities for users to improve their performance. Thus, NOMA users can achieve rates higher than, or equal to, the rates obtained with the convent...

متن کامل

Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway: The Use of Public Health Coordinators and Health Overviews to Promote Fair Distribution Among Social Groups

Background Norway is internationally known today for its political and socio-economic prioritization of equity. The 2012 Public Health Act (PHA) aimed to further equity in the domain of health by addressing the social gradient in health. The PHA’s main policy measures were (1) delegation to the municipal level of responsibility for identifying and targeting underserved groups and (2) the imposi...

متن کامل

The Kurdish Stance on Political and Social Power Structure of the Region

In the war between Ottomans and Safavids Dynasty, two thirds of Kurdistan area was separated from Iran, and joined the Ottoman territories. The Ottoman empire was defeated in World War I and Kurdistan was divided among Turkey, Iraq, Syria, and a small part joined the Soviet Russia, i.e. Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. Concerning the Kurdish governments which were established in Iran being led...

متن کامل

Rethinking the Theory of Change for Health in All Policies; Comment on “Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway: The Use of Public Health Coordinators and Health Overviews to Promote Fair Distribution Among Social Groups”

This commentary discusses the interesting and surprising findings by Hagen and colleagues, focusing on the role of the public health coordinator as a Health in All Policies (HiAP) tool. The original article finds a negative association between the employment of public health coordinators in Norwegian municipalities and consideration of a fair distribution of social and economic resources betwee...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004